What's new

Welcome to W9B - Most Trusted Web Master Form By The Web Experts

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?

Syllogistic Logic and Mathematical Proof

TUTBB

Change Here
Gold
Platinum
Silver
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
44,662
Reaction score
1
Points
38
0   0   0
5a963f81d23d88a3bed7cd5be496dc47.jpeg

Free Download Syllogistic Logic and Mathematical Proof by Prof Paolo Mancosu, Prof Massimo Mugnai
English | August 18, 2023 | ISBN: 0198876920 | 240 pages | MOBI | 0.83 Mb
Does syllogistic logic have the resources to capture mathematical proof? This volume provides the first unified account of the history of attempts to answer this question, the reasoning behind the different positions taken, and their far-reaching implications. Aristotle had claimed that scientific knowledge, which includes mathematics, is provided by syllogisms of a special sort: 'scientific' ('demonstrative') syllogisms. In ancient Greece and in the Middle Ages, the claim that Euclid's theorems could be recast syllogistically was accepted without further scrutiny. Nevertheless, as early as Galen, the importance of relational reasoning for mathematics had already been recognized. Further critical voices emerged in the Renaissance and the question of whether mathematical proofs could be recast syllogistically attracted more sustained attention over the following three centuries. Supported by more detailed analyses of Euclidean theorems, this led to attempts to extend logical theory to include relational reasoning, and to arguments purporting to reduce relational reasoning to a syllogistic form. Philosophical proposals to the effect that mathematical reasoning is heterogenous with respect to logical proofs were famously defended by Kant, and the implications of the debate about the adequacy of syllogistic logic for mathematics are at the very core of Kant's account of synthetic a priori judgments. While it is now widely accepted that syllogistic logic is not sufficient to account for the logic of mathematical proof, the history and the analysis of this debate, running from Aristotle to de Morgan and beyond, is a fascinating and crucial insight into the relationship between philosophy and mathematics.


Buy Premium From My Links To Get Resumable Support and Max Speed

FileFox
8fzze.rar
Rapidgator
8fzze.rar.html
Uploadgig
8fzze.rar

Links are Interchangeable - Single Extraction
 
Top Bottom